Skip to content
Tyler Murphy

#2Tyler Murphy

QB·Boston College·20146.9 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Tyler Murphy is a Dual-Threat QB for Boston College. Tyler's 2014 season ranks in the 43th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 409 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Tyler Murphy's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Passing
131/230 Comp/Att1623 Pass yards13 Pass TD10 INT57.0% Comp %
Rushing
1184 Rush yards11 Rush TD181 Carries6.5 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency43
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency87
  • Clutch74
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)43th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency87th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.62 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Wake Forest (SP+ -8).

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6200.62Wk 1 vs Massachusetts: +0.57 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Pittsburgh: +0.12 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs USC: +0.41 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Maine: +0.58 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Colorado State: +0.46 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs NC State: +0.38 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Clemson: +0.10 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Wake Forest: +0.62 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Virginia Tech: +0.34 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Louisville: +0.27 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Florida State: +0.27 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Syracuse: +0.46 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Penn State: +0.32 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@MassachusettsW30-7-20.217/241731183.711810.57
2vsPittsburghL20-3014.110/281341247.99210.12
3vsUSCW37-3117.15/13540189.719110.41
4vsMaineW40-1011/181301190.79920.58
5vsColorado StateL21-244.512/181690187.47910.46
7@NC StateW30-148.112/191010086.813220.38
8vsClemsonL13-1718.18/191082026.05500.10
9@Wake ForestW23-17-7.811/151651078.97700.62
10@Virginia TechW33-317.88/151102067.212710.34
11vsLouisvilleL19-3817.07/151491426.44100.27
13@Florida StateL17-2028.56/10731065.04810.27
14vsSyracuseW28-7-2.113/171601080.02000.46
1vsPenn StateL30-319.211/19972084.210510.32

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
46.0%
Passing plays
95.4%
Rushing plays
26.1%
Standard downs
37.7%
Passing downs
64.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.29
Passing downs
0.46
Pass / Rush EPA
0.19 / 0.64

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.67+0.05
EPA per play · 2014 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.