Skip to content
Troy Omeire

#5Troy Omeire

Troy Omeire is a Vertical Threat WR for New Mexico.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Troy Omeire's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Receiving
4 Receptions90 Rec yards1 Rec TD22.5 Yards/rec

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

6
Targets
13.8y
Avg depth
11.2y
After catch
67%
Catch rate

The ball travels 13.8 yards in the air on an average target 4.9 yards deeper than the median. Another 11.2 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
1
100% · 64y
0
1
0% · 0y
short
2
100% · 15y
0
2
50% · 11y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume12
  • Explosiveness100
  • Consistency50
  • Pass-Down0
Player type
Vertical Threat WR

Elite deep receiver who stretches the field. Wins downfield, commands safety attention, and creates the threat that opens underneath routes.

Downfield threatYAC upsideCreates space for teammates
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • Peak game: 1.61 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Mercyhurst.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.6101.61Wk 1 vs Central Michigan: +0.35 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Mercyhurst: +1.61 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsCentral MichiganW38-7-20.022010.00110.35
2vsMercyhurstW70-727035.01641.61

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
4.2%
Passing plays
13.0%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
3.7%
Passing downs
5.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
1.63
Passing downs
-0.33
Pass / Rush EPA
0.98 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.