Skip to content
Tevin Coleman

#6Tevin Coleman

RB·Indiana·20145.5 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Tevin Coleman is a Featured Back for Indiana. Tevin's 2014 season ranks in the 73th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 263 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Tevin Coleman's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Rushing
2036 Rush yards15 Rush TD270 Carries7.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
25 Receptions141 Rec yards0 Rec TD5.6 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency73
  • Volume100
  • Explosiveness90
  • Consistency56
  • Receiving52
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)73th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency56th %ile · average
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.44 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.05 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Indiana State.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
LeVante BellamyWestern Michigan0.4005.4107.6
Ameer AbdullahNebraska0.3805.399.6
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5
Bijan RobinsonTexas0.3905.9107.6
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0501.05Wk 1 vs Indiana State: +1.05 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Bowling Green: +0.07 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Missouri: +0.27 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs North Texas: +0.32 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Iowa: +0.72 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Michigan State: +0.02 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Michigan: -0.10 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Penn State: -0.24 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Rutgers: +0.44 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Ohio State: +0.24 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Purdue: -0.07 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsIndiana StateW28-102324710.721.05
3@Bowling GreenL42-45-5.4241907.9343800.07
4@MissouriW31-2719.3191326.9135700.27
5vsMarylandL15-375.7221225.512-20
6vsNorth TexasW49-24-9.4171508.8143400.32
7@IowaL29-456.81521914.632700.72
8vsMichigan StateL17-5624.1151328.802600.02
10@MichiganL10-348.2271084.00-0.10
11vsPenn StateL7-139.220713.504-80-0.24
12@RutgersL23-45-1.5323079.610.44
13@Ohio StateL27-4225.8272288.432300.24
14vsPurdueW23-16-6.2291304.50260-0.07

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
36.2%
Passing plays
10.3%
Rushing plays
53.3%
Standard downs
42.2%
Passing downs
24.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.26
Passing downs
0.23
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.15 / 0.30

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.180−0.37
EPA per play · 2014 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.