Skip to content
Terrell Anderson
Terrell Anderson

#9Terrell Anderson

Terrell Anderson is a Slot Specialist WR for NC State. Terrell's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 50 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Terrell Anderson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
39 Receptions629 Rec yards5 Rec TD16.1 Yards/rec
Returns
6 Punt returns27 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume18
  • Explosiveness61
  • Consistency77
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency77th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.63 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.46 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Campbell.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.4602.46Wk 1 vs East Carolina: -0.24 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Virginia: +1.22 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Wake Forest: +0.83 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Duke: +2.46 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Virginia Tech: +1.33 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Campbell: +2.46 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Notre Dame: +1.46 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Pittsburgh: +0.04 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Georgia Tech: +1.87 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Miami: +0.93 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Florida State: +0.61 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs North Carolina: +0.10 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsEast CarolinaW24-178.03175.7015-0.24
2vsVirginiaW35-3111.134414.70231.22
3@Wake ForestW34-245.734615.30300.83
4@DukeL33-456.6616627.72752.46
5vsVirginia TechL21-23-10.146516.30241.33
6vsCampbellW56-1025025.01342.46
7@Notre DameL7-3624.435719.01451.46
9@PittsburghL34-538.422311.50170.04
10vsGeorgia TechW48-369.325929.50511.87
12@MiamiL7-4120.74256.30140.93
13vsFlorida StateW21-117.244411.01230.61
14vsNorth CarolinaW42-19-6.624120.50290.10
20vsMemphisW31-77.61-8-8.000

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.3%
Passing plays
12.3%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
4.6%
Passing downs
9.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.74
Passing downs
1.09
Pass / Rush EPA
0.92 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.