Skip to content
Shedeur Sanders

#2Shedeur Sanders

QB·Colorado·202420237.0 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Shedeur Sanders is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Colorado. Shedeur's 2023 season ranks in the 23th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 492 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Shedeur Sanders's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
298/430 Comp/Att3230 Pass yards27 Pass TD3 INT69.3% Comp %
Rushing
-77 Rush yards4 Rush TD111 Carries-0.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency23
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat72
  • Consistency79
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)23th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency79th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.13 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.74 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs TCU (SP+ 8).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7400.74Wk 1 vs TCU: +0.74 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Nebraska: +0.47 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Colorado State: +0.24 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Oregon: +0.05 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs USC: +0.29 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Arizona State: +0.26 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Stanford: +0.43 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs UCLA: +0.00 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Oregon State: +0.09 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Arizona: +0.32 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Washington State: +0.29 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@TCUW45-427.938/475104091.1-3200.74
2vsNebraskaW36-140.331/423932068.0-3010.47
3vsColorado StateW43-35-8.938/473484163.6300.24
4@OregonL6-4226.223/331591028.2-3400.05
5vsUSCL41-489.430/453714164.55010.29
6@Arizona StateW27-24-11.326/422391061.3-1710.26
7vsStanfordL43-46-11.933/474005173.63700.43
9@UCLAL16-289.727/432171038.2-2000.00
10vsOregon StateL19-2612.624/392452040.2-3700.09
11vsArizonaL31-3414.122/352622069.82910.32
12@Washington StateL14-564.96/10861046.5-2600.29

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
67.7%
Passing plays
95.5%
Rushing plays
20.4%
Standard downs
62.2%
Passing downs
78.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.10
Passing downs
0.61
Pass / Rush EPA
0.31 / 0.26

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.820−0.072024
EPA per play · 2023 — 2024 · 24 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2023Colorado
7.0
245.2
2024Colorado
8.7
258.9

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.