Skip to content
Sahmir Hagans

#2Sahmir Hagans

WR·Duke·2025

Sahmir Hagans is a Slot Specialist WR for Duke. Sahmir's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 62 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Sahmir Hagans's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
44 Receptions512 Rec yards6 Rec TD11.6 Yards/rec
Returns
14 Kick returns467 KR yards1 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume18
  • Explosiveness31
  • Consistency65
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency65th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.81 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs NC State (SP+ 5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.8101.81Wk 1 vs Elon: +1.04 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Illinois: -0.03 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Tulane: +0.10 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs NC State: +1.81 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Syracuse: +0.64 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs California: -0.54 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Georgia Tech: +1.72 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Clemson: -0.63 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UConn: +1.23 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Virginia: +0.81 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs North Carolina: +1.10 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Wake Forest: +0.10 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Virginia: +1.39 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsElonW45-1755410.82211.04
2vsIllinoisL19-4512.933311.0024-0.03
3@TulaneL27-346.312929.01290.10
4vsNC StateW45-334.836321.01331.81
5@SyracuseW38-3-13.155911.80230.64
6@CaliforniaW45-21-3.23103.304-0.54
8vsGeorgia TechL18-279.356913.81241.72
10@ClemsonW46-459.5320.703-0.63
11@UConnL34-375.122311.50171.23
12vsVirginiaL17-3411.113535.00350.81
13@North CarolinaW32-25-6.633010.00221.10
14vsWake ForestW49-325.722914.51300.10
15vsVirginiaW27-2011.123115.50351.39
20vsArizona StateW42-393.96457.509

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.4%
Passing plays
11.7%
Rushing plays
0.2%
Standard downs
4.7%
Passing downs
10.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.29
Passing downs
0.91
Pass / Rush EPA
0.53 / 4.24

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.