Skip to content
Ronnel Johnson

#9Ronnel Johnson

Ronnel Johnson is a Slot Specialist WR for Missouri State. Ronnel's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 57 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ronnel Johnson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
35 Receptions463 Rec yards2 Rec TD13.2 Yards/rec
Returns
3 Kick returns62 KR yards0 KR TD4 Punt returns10 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume19
  • Explosiveness42
  • Consistency59
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency59th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.17 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.94 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Louisiana Tech (SP+ -1).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Xavier WhiteTexas Tech0.3000.518.6
Ainias SmithTexas A&M0.3100.517.0
Samajie GrantArizona0.2500.315.5
Tyler BuchnerNotre Dame0.2500.312.8
Noah ShortArmy0.3000.520.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9400.94Wk 1 vs USC: +0.36 EPA/play1Wk 4 vs UT Martin: +0.26 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Western Kentucky: +0.48 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.93 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs New Mexico State: +0.48 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Florida International: -0.38 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Liberty: -0.32 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UTEP: +0.88 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Kennesaw State: -0.16 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.94 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@USCL13-7316.92178.50110.36
4vsUT MartinW42-1035117.00350.26
5vsWestern KentuckyL22-271.656412.80190.48
7@Middle TennesseeW22-20-16.056913.81200.93
9@New Mexico StateW24-17-15.569916.51350.48
10vsFlorida InternationalW28-21-10.53299.7014-0.38
11@LibertyW21-17-9.011515.0015-0.32
12vsUTEPW38-24-17.535418.00250.88
13@Kennesaw StateL34-41-5.422010.0016-0.16
14vsLouisiana TechL30-42-1.322010.00140.94
20vsArkansas StateL28-34-8.83258.3013

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.8%
Passing plays
12.1%
Rushing plays
0.3%
Standard downs
5.2%
Passing downs
9.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.04
Passing downs
0.63
Pass / Rush EPA
0.35 / -3.39

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.