Skip to content
Reis Kessel

#81Reis Kessel

Reis Kessel is a Vertical Threat TE for North Dakota State.

What projects, and what doesn't · TEs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.42
    Beats guessing the TE average by 9%. n=2,225 TE seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.04
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=2,016 TE seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.46
    Beats guessing the TE average by 13%. n=2,016 TE seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Reis Kessel's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
15 Receptions335 Rec yards1 Rec TD22.3 Yards/rec

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

12
Targets
5.8y
Avg depth
4.2y
After catch
75%
Catch rate

The ball travels 5.8 yards in the air on an average target 3.1 yards shorter than the median. Another 4.2 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
0
0
0
short
3
33% · 18y
3
100% · 28y
6
83% · 44y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume7
  • Explosiveness100
  • Consistency81
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Vertical Threat TE

Elite deep receiver who stretches the field. Wins downfield, commands safety attention, and creates the threat that opens underneath routes.

Downfield threatYAC upsideCreates space for teammates
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency81th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 10 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.22 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 4.29 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Southern Illinois.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+4.2904.29Wk 1 vs The Citadel: +1.53 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Tennessee State: +1.66 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Southeast Missouri State: +4.08 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs South Dakota: +1.54 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Illinois State: +0.77 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Southern Illinois: +4.29 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Indiana State: +1.48 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs South Dakota State: +1.65 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Youngstown State: +3.18 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs North Dakota: +0.00 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Northern Iowa: +2.15 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@The CitadelW38-013131.00311.53
2@Tennessee StateW59-314141.00411.66
3vsSoutheast Missouri StateW41-1413131.00314.08
5vsSouth DakotaW51-1322914.51291.54
6@Illinois StateW33-16199.0090.77
7vsSouthern IllinoisW45-1715050.00504.29
8@Indiana StateW38-733913.00161.48
9@South Dakota StateW38-723718.50201.65
10vsYoungstown StateW38-3012121.00213.18
11@North DakotaW15-1013030.00300.00
12vsNorthern IowaW48-1611717.00172.15

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
2.4%
Passing plays
7.0%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
1.3%
Passing downs
5.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.92
Passing downs
2.21
Pass / Rush EPA
1.67 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.