← Player leaders
Quinton Jackson is a Committee Back for Rice. Quinton's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 55 plays — a developing rate for the RB.
2024 Production
Rushing
275 Rush yards1 Rush TD48 Carries5.7 Yards/carry
Receiving
11 Receptions69 Rec yards1 Rec TD6.3 Yards/rec
Returns
22 Kick returns589 KR yards1 KR TD
Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers
Player type
Committee Back
Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.
Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency32th %ile · below avg
Key findings
- ▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
- ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
- ▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
- ▸3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
- ▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.72 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
- ▸Peak game: 1.65 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Army (SP+ 9).
NIL Market Tier· 2024
On3 valuation ↗Starter
Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | Car | Rush Yds | Avg | Rush TD | Rec | Rec Yds | Rec TD | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vsSam Houston | L14-34 | -6.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2 | vsTexas Southern | W69-7 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 0 | — | — | — | 1.03 |
| 3 | @Houston | L7-33 | -8.2 | 5 | 21 | 4.2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.12 |
| 4 | @Army | L14-37 | 9.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.65 |
| 5 | vsCharlotte | L20-21 | -15.3 | 5 | 28 | 5.6 | 0 | 3 | 32 | 1 | 0.87 |
| 7 | vsUTSA | W29-27 | 2.2 | 8 | 13 | 1.6 | 0 | — | — | — | -0.30 |
| 8 | @Tulane | L10-24 | 5.7 | 4 | -3 | -0.8 | 0 | — | — | — | -0.66 |
| 9 | @UConn | L10-17 | 1.5 | 6 | 37 | 6.2 | 0 | — | — | — | 0.31 |
| 10 | vsNavy | W24-10 | 3.5 | 3 | 11 | 3.7 | 0 | 2 | 22 | 0 | -0.10 |
| 11 | @Memphis | L20-27 | 9.6 | 6 | 70 | 11.7 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.11 |
| 13 | @UAB | L14-40 | -11.3 | 3 | 18 | 6.0 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 0 | -0.20 |
| 14 | vsSouth Florida | W35-28 | -2.3 | 5 | 40 | 8.0 | 1 | — | — | — | 0.27 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.6%
Passing plays
3.0%
Rushing plays
17.4%
Standard downs
9.2%
Passing downs
7.7%
EPA by down type
- Standard downs
- 0.07
- Passing downs
- 0.08
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 0.20 / 0.04
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).