#10Quinton Jackson

RB·Rice·2025

Quinton Jackson is a Committee Back for Rice. Quinton's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 183 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.52
Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.41
Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Quinton Jackson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing

889 Rush yards6 Rush TD180 Carries4.9 Yards/carry

Receiving

4 Receptions74 Rec yards1 Rec TD18.5 Yards/rec

Returns

13 Kick returns262 KR yards0 KR TD1 Punt returns3 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

Efficiency0
Volume63
Explosiveness38
Consistency0
Receiving32

Player type

Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.18 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 0.74 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs UConn (SP+ 5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

Player	Team	Yr	Plays	WEPA/play	Line val	Total EPA
Saquon Barkley	Penn State	2016	288	0.340	3.9	97.9
Dalvin Cook	Florida State	2016	292	0.340	4.3	99.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Car	Rush Yds	Avg	Rush TD	Rec	Rec Yds	Rec TD	EPA/play
1	@Louisiana	W14-12	-10.1	22	119	5.4	1	1	-6	0	0.23
2	vsHouston	L9-35	7.4	15	52	3.5	0	—	—	—	-0.06
3	vsPrairie View A&M	W38-17	—	9	42	4.7	1	—	—	—	0.27
4	@Charlotte	W28-17	-26.7	12	80	6.7	0	—	—	—	0.17
5	@Navy	L13-21	6.2	15	60	4.0	0	—	—	—	0.05
6	vsFlorida Atlantic	L21-27	-8.7	19	128	6.7	1	—	—	—	0.17
7	@UTSA	L13-61	3.7	4	6	1.5	0	—	—	—	-0.04
9	vsUConn	W37-34	5.1	21	168	8.0	3	3	80	1	0.74
10	vsMemphis	L14-38	7.6	9	22	2.4	0	—	—	—	-0.38
11	vsUAB	W24-17	-15.8	22	81	3.7	0	—	—	—	-0.13
13	vsNorth Texas	L24-56	13.8	14	50	3.6	0	—	—	—	-0.00
14	@South Florida	L3-52	11.6	2	3	1.5	0	—	—	—	-0.42
20	vsTexas State	L10-41	2.3	16	78	4.9	0	—	—	—	—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

22.0%

Passing plays

3.9%

Rushing plays

29.5%

Standard downs

26.1%

Passing downs

13.4%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.11
Passing downs: 0.03
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.65 / 0.07

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).