Skip to content
Peyton Higgins

#2Peyton Higgins

WR·Troy·2025

Peyton Higgins is a Slot Specialist WR for Troy. Peyton's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 57 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Peyton Higgins's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
36 Receptions301 Rec yards1 Rec TD8.4 Yards/rec
Returns
8 Kick returns141 KR yards0 KR TD17 Punt returns98 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume17
  • Explosiveness9
  • Consistency40
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency40th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.47 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.35 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Nicholls.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
JoJo NatsonUtah State0.3901.019.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.3502.35Wk 1 vs Nicholls: +2.35 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Clemson: -0.02 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Memphis: -0.41 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Buffalo: +0.35 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs South Alabama: -1.01 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Texas State: +1.75 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UL Monroe: +1.84 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Louisiana: +0.60 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Arkansas State: +0.17 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Old Dominion: -0.44 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Georgia State: +0.27 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Southern Miss: +0.83 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs James Madison: -0.08 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsNichollsW38-2022110.50142.35
2@ClemsonL16-279.5144.004-0.02
3vsMemphisL7-287.6200.005-0.41
4@BuffaloW21-17-7.52136.5070.35
6vsSouth AlabamaW31-24-12.7-1.01
7@Texas StateW48-412.344010.00191.75
8@UL MonroeW37-14-21.63299.70111.84
9vsLouisianaW35-23-10.13227.30100.60
10vsArkansas StateL10-23-8.83217.0080.17
12@Old DominionL0-335.9144.004-0.44
13vsGeorgia StateW31-19-24.55489.60210.27
14@Southern MissW28-18-7.16518.51160.83
15@James MadisonL14-3112.311717.0017-0.08
20vsJacksonville StateL13-17-6.733110.3020

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.1%
Passing plays
11.5%
Rushing plays
0.4%
Standard downs
4.5%
Passing downs
9.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.21
Passing downs
0.71
Pass / Rush EPA
0.51 / -0.82

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.