Skip to content
Nick Herman

#23Nick Herman

Nick Herman is a Pass-Catching Back for James Madison.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Nick Herman's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Rushing
135 Rush yards2 Rush TD10 Carries13.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
2 Receptions12 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume25
  • Explosiveness100
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving89
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.31 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Wagner.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.3101.31Wk 1 vs Liberty: -0.18 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Wagner: +1.31 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsLibertyW20-13-7.2231.50-0.18
2vsWagnerW87-3813216.5221201.31

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.8%
Passing plays
4.3%
Rushing plays
10.9%
Standard downs
10.0%
Passing downs
4.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.11
Passing downs
2.88
Pass / Rush EPA
0.38 / 0.66

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.