#5Myles Butler

WR·Middle Tennessee·2025

Myles Butler is a Versatile WR for Middle Tennessee. Myles's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 76 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.47
Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
Total EPA (value)0.45
Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Myles Butler's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving

52 Receptions518 Rec yards2 Rec TD10.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

Efficiency100
Volume27
Explosiveness20
Consistency74
Pass-Down14

Player type

Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.17 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 0.94 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Missouri State (SP+ -11).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

Player	Team	Yr	Plays	WEPA/play	Line val	Total EPA
Keytaon Thompson	Mississippi State	2017	70	0.460	1.2	32.2
Savion Williams	TCU	2024	56	0.450	1.1	25.2
DeAndre Hughes	Air Force	2021	60	0.470	1.3	28.2
Javion Posey	Florida Atlantic	2020	53	0.450	1.4	23.8
Dane Kinamon	Air Force	2021	39	0.410	0.7	16.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	vsAustin Peay	L14-34	—	1	8	8.0	0	8	-0.42
2	@Wisconsin	L10-42	-4.4	4	43	10.8	0	21	0.70
3	@Nevada	W14-13	-13.4	7	65	9.3	0	23	0.84
4	vsMarshall	L28-42	-4.5	3	36	12.0	0	18	0.28
5	@Kennesaw State	L16-24	-5.4	4	28	7.0	0	20	0.08
7	vsMissouri State	L20-22	-10.7	3	37	12.3	0	14	0.94
9	@Delaware	L28-31	-10.9	4	31	7.8	0	12	0.70
11	vsFlorida International	L30-56	-10.5	5	31	6.2	1	12	0.15
12	@Western Kentucky	L26-42	1.6	7	105	15.0	1	52	0.56
13	vsSam Houston	W31-17	-27.8	6	65	10.8	0	24	0.43
14	@New Mexico State	W31-24	-15.5	8	69	8.6	0	25	0.51

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

9.4%

Passing plays

14.6%

Rushing plays

0.7%

Standard downs

8.8%

Passing downs

10.7%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.58
Passing downs: 0.37
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.48 / 1.04

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).