Skip to content
Mudia Reuben

#6Mudia Reuben

Mudia Reuben is a Versatile WR for South Florida. Mudia's 2025 season produced 20.9 total EPA across 45 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Mudia Reuben's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
36 Receptions495 Rec yards5 Rec TD13.8 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume17
  • Explosiveness45
  • Consistency62
  • Pass-Down23
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency62th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.89 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.66 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Rice (SP+ -15).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Micah DavisAir Force0.3700.616.3
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia0.3700.615.2

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.6601.66Wk 1 vs Boise State: -0.20 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Florida: +0.35 EPA/play2Wk 6 vs Charlotte: -0.05 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs North Texas: +0.26 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Florida Atlantic: -0.01 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Memphis: -0.05 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs UTSA: +0.54 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Navy: +1.61 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UAB: +1.02 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Rice: +1.66 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsBoise StateW34-73.13124.006-0.20
2@FloridaW18-163.55448.80150.35
6vsCharlotteW54-26-26.74338.3113-0.05
7@North TexasW63-3613.83165.3080.26
8vsFlorida AtlanticW48-13-8.712222.0022-0.01
9@MemphisL31-347.64266.5011-0.05
11vsUTSAW55-233.72178.50130.54
12@NavyL38-416.246115.31411.61
13@UABW48-18-15.8517434.82601.02
14vsRiceW52-3-14.859018.01601.66

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.1%
Passing plays
13.4%
Rushing plays
0.2%
Standard downs
6.1%
Passing downs
6.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.51
Passing downs
0.35
Pass / Rush EPA
0.56 / -3.90

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.