Skip to content
McCae Hillstead

#2McCae Hillstead

McCae Hillstead is a Dual-Threat QB for Utah State. McCae's 2026 season produced 15.8 total EPA across 38 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So McCae Hillstead's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
15/30 Comp/Att178 Pass yards2 Pass TD3 INT50.0% Comp %
Rushing
43 Rush yards0 Rush TD9 Carries4.8 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

26
Attempts
9.7y
Avg depth
4.4y
After catch
54%
Catch rate

The ball travels 9.7 yards in the air on an average throw 1.2 yards deeper than the median. Another 4.4 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
2
0% · 0y
0
0
short
8
63% · 58y
3
67% · 35y
13
54% · 70y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency60
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)60th %ile · average
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsIdaho StateL17-2915/30178234300.41

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
42.7%
Passing plays
66.7%
Rushing plays
18.6%
Standard downs
38.3%
Passing downs
51.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.03
Passing downs
1.10
Pass / Rush EPA
0.37 / 0.59

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.