Skip to content
Mark Fletcher Jr.
Mark Fletcher Jr.

#4Mark Fletcher Jr.

Mark Fletcher Jr. is a Explosive Back for Miami.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

20%
projected
band 13%'25 24%28%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Mark Fletcher Jr.'s projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Rushing
145 Rush yards2 Rush TD20 Carries7.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
2 Receptions10 Rec yards0 Rec TD5.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency83
  • Volume46
  • Explosiveness86
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving55
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)83th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the RB position (83th percentile).
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.99 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Florida A&M.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9900.99Wk 1 vs Stanford: -0.10 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Florida A&M: +0.99 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@StanfordW45-6-4.713403.102100-0.10
2vsFlorida A&MW77-7710515.020.99

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
16.1%
Passing plays
4.9%
Rushing plays
26.3%
Standard downs
17.5%
Passing downs
8.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.26
Passing downs
0.44
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.15 / 0.34

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.800−0.13
EPA per play · 2025 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.