Skip to content
Marcel Reed

#10Marcel Reed

Marcel Reed is a Volume Passer for Texas A&M. Marcel's 2026 season ranks in the 10th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 69 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

43%
projected
band 25%'25 50%61%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Marcel Reed's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
36/55 Comp/Att396 Pass yards5 Pass TD1 INT65.5% Comp %
Rushing
37 Rush yards0 Rush TD14 Carries2.6 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency10
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat28
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch52
Player type
Volume Passer

High-rep offense that leans on this QB's arm — value comes through cumulative production across a high number of plays.

High play countFranchise-volume role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)10th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Peak game: 0.41 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Missouri State (SP+ -24).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4100.41Wk 1 vs Missouri State: +0.41 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Arizona State: +0.23 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsMissouri StateW50-0-24.321/30233202000.41
2vsArizona StateW48-208.715/25163311700.23

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
45.7%
Passing plays
87.7%
Rushing plays
13.6%
Standard downs
36.1%
Passing downs
69.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.30
Passing downs
0.36
Pass / Rush EPA
0.40 / 0.04

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.690−0.04
EPA per play · 2025 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.