Skip to content
Maguire Anderson
Maguire Anderson

#2Maguire Anderson

Maguire Anderson is a Slot Specialist WR for Florida International. Maguire's 2025 season produced 17.7 total EPA across 36 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Maguire Anderson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
25 Receptions280 Rec yards1 Rec TD11.2 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns10 KR yards0 KR TD9 Punt returns149 PR yards1 PR TD

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

18
Targets
11.2y
Avg depth
5.8y
After catch
72%
Catch rate

The ball travels 11.2 yards in the air on an average target 2.3 yards deeper than the median. Another 5.8 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
0
2
50% · 45y
0
short
5
60% · 40y
3
100% · 19y
8
75% · 82y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume14
  • Explosiveness28
  • Consistency73
  • Pass-Down0
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency73th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.52 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 2.88 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Liberty (SP+ -9).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.8802.88Wk 1 vs Bethune-Cookman: +0.65 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Penn State: +1.46 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.56 EPA/play3Wk 8 vs Western Kentucky: +0.63 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Kennesaw State: +0.69 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Missouri State: +0.06 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.77 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Liberty: +2.88 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Sam Houston: +0.31 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsBethune-CookmanW42-9199.0090.65
2@Penn StateL0-3418.112222.00221.46
3vsFlorida AtlanticW38-28-8.758116.20460.56
8@Western KentuckyW25-61.64297.30140.63
9vsKennesaw StateL26-45-5.45499.80150.69
10@Missouri StateL21-28-10.711212.00120.06
11@Middle TennesseeW56-30-16.03279.00140.77
12vsLibertyW34-27-9.0177.0172.88
13vsJacksonville StateW27-21-6.7
14vsSam HoustonW56-16-27.811919.00190.31
20vsUTSAL20-573.73258.3011

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.0%
Passing plays
9.9%
Rushing plays
0.2%
Standard downs
3.7%
Passing downs
7.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.68
Passing downs
0.34
Pass / Rush EPA
0.51 / -0.14

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.