Skip to content
Maddux Madsen

#4Maddux Madsen

Maddux Madsen is a Dual-Threat QB for Boise State. Maddux's 2025 season ranks in the 8th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 333 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Maddux Madsen's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
176/302 Comp/Att2333 Pass yards18 Pass TD9 INT58.3% Comp %
Rushing
81 Rush yards4 Rush TD57 Carries1.4 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

28
Attempts
7.3y
Avg depth
5.0y
After catch
50%
Catch rate

The ball travels 7.3 yards in the air on an average throw 0.5 yards shorter than the median. Another 5.0 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
0
0
1
0% · 0y
short
11
64% · 89y
3
33% · 7y
13
46% · 72y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency8
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency66
  • Clutch76
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)8th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency66th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.12 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.85 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Air Force (SP+ -3).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8500.85Wk 1 vs South Florida: -0.02 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Eastern Washington: +0.77 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Air Force: +0.85 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs App State: +0.56 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Notre Dame: -0.13 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs New Mexico: +0.40 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UNLV: +0.81 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Nevada: +0.30 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Fresno State: -0.43 EPA/play10Wk 15 vs UNLV: +0.47 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@South FloridaL7-3411.625/462251026.0310-0.02
2vsEastern WashingtonW51-1416/263072085.13510.77
4@Air ForceW49-37-3.213/232762174.50.85
5vsApp StateW47-14-11.425/373214083.8-1400.56
6@Notre DameL7-2824.422/372150443.951-0.13
7vsNew MexicoW41-250.921/312262046.8-1900.40
8vsUNLVW56-314.314/232534183.52300.81
9@NevadaW24-3-13.415/281740142.21510.30
10vsFresno StateL7-301.81/4-4003.9-60-0.43
15vsUNLVW38-214.317/312893090.61010.47
20vsWashingtonL10-3818.47/1651024.410

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
45.5%
Passing plays
81.8%
Rushing plays
10.9%
Standard downs
38.6%
Passing downs
58.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.23
Passing downs
0.41
Pass / Rush EPA
0.28 / 0.47

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.070−0.22
EPA per play · 2024 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.