Skip to content
Luke Bottari

#15Luke Bottari

QB·Utah·2024

Luke Bottari is a Dual-Threat QB for Utah. Luke's 2024 season produced 7.7 total EPA across 37 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Luke Bottari's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing
19/30 Comp/Att171 Pass yards1 Pass TD0 INT63.3% Comp %
Rushing
34 Rush yards0 Rush TD9 Carries3.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume65
  • Dual-Threat79
  • Consistency74
  • Clutch0
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Peak game: 1.49 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Colorado (SP+ 8).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.4901.49Wk 12 vs Colorado: +1.49 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Iowa State: +0.44 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs UCF: +0.09 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
12@ColoradoL24-498.11/150099.61.49
13vsIowa StateL28-3110.35/9550094.94700.44
14@UCFW28-142.813/201111041.4-1300.09

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
22.9%
Passing plays
37.3%
Rushing plays
8.4%
Standard downs
16.3%
Passing downs
32.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.32
Passing downs
0.12
Pass / Rush EPA
0.19 / 0.29

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.