Skip to content
Logan Woodside

#11Logan Woodside

QB·Toledo·2017201615.4 pts line value1st Round

Logan Woodside is a 2-year Clutch Passer for Toledo. Logan's 2016 season ranks in the 95th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 393 plays — a elite rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Logan Woodside's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Passing
289/418 Comp/Att4129 Pass yards45 Pass TD9 INT69.1% Comp %
Rushing
-40 Rush yards0 Rush TD37 Carries-1.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency95
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency89
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)95th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency89th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.27 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.89 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs BYU (SP+ 8).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Blake SimsAlabama0.69615.4329.4
Dillon GabrielOklahoma0.73216.1346.4
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6
Jayden DanielsLSU0.78317.5360.8
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8900.89Wk 1 vs Arkansas State: +0.63 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Maine: +0.87 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Fresno State: +0.53 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs BYU: +0.89 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.41 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Central Michigan: +0.64 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Ohio: +0.46 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Akron: +0.58 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Northern Illinois: +0.24 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Ball State: +0.31 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Western Michigan: +0.31 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs App State: +0.48 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@Arkansas StateW31-10-1.223/313713097.6200.63
2vsMaineW45-313/253294189.0600.87
3vsFresno StateW52-17-16.915/262394083.11000.53
5@BYUL53-558.030/385055294.3-500.89
6@Eastern MichiganW35-20-8.225/312474086.9-300.41
7vsBowling GreenW42-35-6.623/303224182.7-110
8vsCentral MichiganW31-17-6.123/322644075.5-400.64
9vsOhioL26-31-2.132/464383165.31400.46
10@AkronW48-17-5.626/373273083.9600.58
11vsNorthern IllinoisW31-24-2.423/332863155.9-3200.24
12vsBall StateW37-19-7.025/393253173.4-100.31
13@Western MichiganL35-5511.513/242293229.6-2100.31
1vsApp StateL28-319.218/262472079.6-100.48

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
48.0%
Passing plays
98.8%
Rushing plays
5.0%
Standard downs
40.7%
Passing downs
66.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.27
Passing downs
0.93
Pass / Rush EPA
0.59 / -0.54

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.050−0.292017
EPA per play · 2016 — 2017 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2016Toledo
15.4
302.7
2017Toledo
10.7
255.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.