Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Lincoln Pare

#7Lincoln Pare

Lincoln Pare is a Explosive Back for Texas State. Lincoln's 2024 season ranks in the 38th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 89 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2024 Production

Rushing
547 Rush yards8 Rush TD94 Carries5.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
12 Receptions134 Rec yards0 Rec TD11.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)38th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency54th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.60 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 2.92 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Southern Miss (SP+ -26).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Lamar: +0.52 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UTSA: +0.73 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Arizona State: -0.14 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Sam Houston: +0.15 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Arkansas State: +0.18 EPA/play7Wk 10 vs Louisiana: +0.05 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UL Monroe: -0.03 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Southern Miss: +2.92 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Georgia State: +1.02 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs South Alabama: +0.23 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs North Texas: +0.29 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsLamarW34-276244.000.52
2vsUTSAW49-102.2111099.920.73
3vsArizona StateL28-319.46223.70-0.14
5vsSam HoustonL39-40-6.96101.7111100.15
7vsArkansas StateW41-9-9.94143.5011400.18
10vsLouisianaL17-234.8231.500.05
11@UL MonroeW38-17-16.77314.40-0.03
12vsSouthern MissW58-3-25.627437.012.92
13vsGeorgia StateL44-52-17.93217.0111101.02
14@South AlabamaW45-382.826963.7156600.23
1vsNorth TexasW30-28-4.5211436.8243200.29

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
13.1%
Passing plays
3.3%
Rushing plays
21.7%
Standard downs
15.7%
Passing downs
6.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.20
Passing downs
0.85
Pass / Rush EPA
0.90 / 0.22

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.