Skip to content
Levi Lewis

#1Levi Lewis

QB·Louisiana·202020196.2 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Levi Lewis is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Louisiana. Levi's 2019 season ranks in the 38th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 437 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Levi Lewis's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2019 Production

Passing
243/377 Comp/Att3050 Pass yards26 Pass TD4 INT64.5% Comp %
Rushing
195 Rush yards3 Rush TD69 Carries2.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency38
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat85
  • Consistency80
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)38th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.16 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.84 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Texas Southern.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8400.84Wk 1 vs Mississippi State: +0.33 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Liberty: +0.14 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Texas Southern: +0.84 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Ohio: +0.17 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Georgia Southern: +0.50 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs App State: -0.09 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Arkansas State: +0.34 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Texas State: +0.57 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.78 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs South Alabama: +0.18 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Troy: +0.30 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs UL Monroe: +0.72 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs App State: +0.20 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Miami (OH): +0.63 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsMississippi StateL28-383.524/392671148.3-1010.33
2vsLibertyW35-14-2.615/231792185.62510.14
3vsTexas SouthernW77-610/131812097.2500.84
4@OhioW45-253.719/291882046.1-500.17
5@Georgia SouthernW37-24-4.511/181651092.22700.50
7vsApp StateL7-1711.313/241311051.3-160-0.09
8@Arkansas StateW37-20-2.917/241810183.03600.34
10vsTexas StateW31-3-16.213/21183204000.57
11@Coastal CarolinaW48-7-12.826/30296301310.78
12@South AlabamaW37-27-20.316/2813620700.18
13vsTroyW53-3-4.421/3327310-1000.30
14vsUL MonroeW31-30-10.715/23270301500.72
15@App StateL38-4511.324/4635441600.20
1vsMiami (OH)W27-17-9.219/26246206200.63

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
44.3%
Passing plays
91.6%
Rushing plays
10.2%
Standard downs
37.7%
Passing downs
63.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.14
Passing downs
0.75
Pass / Rush EPA
0.37 / 0.32

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.930−0.182020
EPA per play · 2019 — 2020 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2019Louisiana
6.2
213.0
2020Louisiana
5.7
168.1

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.