#20Leo Pulalasi

RB·Washington State·2025

Leo Pulalasi is a Pass-Catching Back for Washington State. Leo's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 50 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.52
Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.41
Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Leo Pulalasi's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing

205 Rush yards0 Rush TD38 Carries5.4 Yards/carry

Receiving

12 Receptions77 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

Efficiency0
Volume20
Explosiveness48
Consistency0
Receiving100

Player type

Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.49 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 0.88 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Idaho.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Car	Rush Yds	Avg	Rush TD	Rec	Rec Yds	Rec TD	EPA/play
1	vsIdaho	W13-10	—	—	—	—	—	1	14	0	0.88
2	vsSan Diego State	W36-13	6.7	5	30	6.0	0	1	5	0	-0.17
3	@North Texas	L10-59	13.8	7	17	2.4	0	1	-3	0	-0.38
4	vsWashington	L24-59	18.4	—	—	—	—	1	5	0	0.32
5	@Colorado State	W20-3	-15.6	3	50	16.7	0	1	18	0	0.83
7	@Ole Miss	L21-24	24.0	—	—	—	—	3	22	0	-0.01
8	@Virginia	L20-22	11.1	3	24	8.0	0	2	18	0	-0.07
9	vsToledo	W28-7	6.0	5	23	4.6	0	1	-3	0	-0.29
10	@Oregon State	L7-10	-15.9	1	5	5.0	0	—	—	—	0.08
12	vsLouisiana Tech	W28-3	-1.3	6	20	3.3	0	—	—	—	-0.22
13	@James Madison	L20-24	12.3	1	0	0.0	0	—	—	—	-0.72
20	vsUtah State	W34-21	-3.1	7	36	5.1	0	1	1	0	—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

7.0%

Passing plays

4.5%

Rushing plays

9.9%

Standard downs

8.0%

Passing downs

5.0%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.06
Passing downs: -0.34
Pass / Rush EPA: -0.04 / -0.02

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).