Skip to content
Lache Seastrunk

#25Lache Seastrunk

RB·Baylor·20131.3 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Lache Seastrunk is a Committee Back for Baylor. Lache's 2013 season ranks in the 35th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 139 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Lache Seastrunk's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2013 Production

Rushing
1177 Rush yards11 Rush TD158 Carries7.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2013 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency35
  • Volume51
  • Explosiveness88
  • Consistency63
  • Receiving0
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)35th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency63th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.17 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.39 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Wofford.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.3900.39Wk 1 vs Wofford: +0.39 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Buffalo: +0.28 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs UL Monroe: +0.30 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs West Virginia: +0.10 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Kansas State: -0.02 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Iowa State: +0.11 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Kansas: +0.07 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Oklahoma: -0.05 EPA/play11Wk 14 vs TCU: +0.04 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Texas: -0.13 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs UCF: +0.29 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDEPA/play
1vsWoffordW69-31111110.120.39
2vsBuffaloW70-13-9.0171508.830.28
4vsUL MonroeW70-7-26.21015615.610.30
6vsWest VirginiaW73-42-0.91517211.520.10
7@Kansas StateW35-2521.712594.90-0.02
8vsIowa StateW71-7-3.8181126.220.11
9@KansasW59-14-9.7131098.410.07
11vsOklahomaW41-1219.66193.20-0.05
14@TCUW41-3812.424943.900.04
15vsTexasW30-1010.515785.20-0.13
1vsUCFL42-5212.3171176.900.29

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
17.8%
Passing plays
0.0%
Rushing plays
31.1%
Standard downs
20.2%
Passing downs
11.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.05
Passing downs
0.38
Pass / Rush EPA
— / 0.11

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.440−0.18
EPA per play · 2013 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.