Skip to content
La'Vell Wright
La'Vell Wright

#29La'Vell Wright

RB·Western Kentucky·2025

La'Vell Wright is a Explosive Back for Western Kentucky. La'Vell's 2025 season ranks in the 83th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 89 plays — a above-average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So La'Vell Wright's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
471 Rush yards10 Rush TD85 Carries5.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
10 Receptions88 Rec yards1 Rec TD8.8 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency83
  • Volume29
  • Explosiveness50
  • Consistency58
  • Receiving42
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)83th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency58th %ile · average
Key findings
  • ▸Above-average efficiency for the RB position (83th percentile).
  • ▸4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • ▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.18 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • ▸Peak game: 1.10 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Nevada (SP+ -13).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.100−1.10Wk 1 vs North Alabama: +0.00 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Toledo: +0.19 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Nevada: +1.10 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Missouri State: +0.70 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Delaware: -0.10 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Florida International: -0.00 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Louisiana Tech: -0.17 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs New Mexico State: -0.01 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.51 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs LSU: +0.27 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Jacksonville State: +0.41 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
0vsSam HoustonW41-24-27.86223.71140—
1vsNorth AlabamaW55-6—294.50———0.00
2@ToledoL21-456.0382.7011300.19
4vsNevadaW31-16-13.47476.721501.10
5@Missouri StateW27-22-10.710919.1211300.70
6@DelawareW27-24-10.99262.901220-0.10
8vsFlorida InternationalL6-25-10.5341.30260-0.00
9@Louisiana TechW28-27-1.34-8-2.001151-0.17
10vsNew Mexico StateW35-16-15.56447.31130-0.01
12vsMiddle TennesseeW42-26-16.011847.62———0.51
13@LSUL10-1310.35173.401700.27
14@Jacksonville StateL34-37-6.7141168.32———0.41
20vsSouthern MissW27-16-7.15112.20————

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
10.3%
Passing plays
2.4%
Rushing plays
20.8%
Standard downs
12.0%
Passing downs
6.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.23
Passing downs
0.51
Pass / Rush EPA
0.62 / 0.24

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.