#5Kyle Parker

WR·LSU·2025

Kyle Parker is a Slot Specialist WR for LSU.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.47
Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
Total EPA (value)0.45
Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kyle Parker's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving

31 Receptions330 Rec yards4 Rec TD10.6 Yards/rec

Returns

2 Kick returns35 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

Efficiency100
Volume13
Explosiveness24
Consistency91
Pass-Down0

Player type

Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency91th %ile · elite

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Peak game: 1.44 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs South Carolina (SP+ 6).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

Player	Team	Yr	Plays	WEPA/play	Line val	Total EPA
Quadree Henderson	Pittsburgh	2016	63	0.530	1.6	33.4
DeAndre Hughes	Air Force	2021	60	0.470	1.3	28.2
Keytaon Thompson	Mississippi State	2017	70	0.460	1.2	32.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.	Central Michigan	2022	53	0.460	1.6	24.4
Savion Williams	TCU	2024	56	0.450	1.1	25.2

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	@Clemson	W17-10	9.5	1	16	16.0	0	16	1.26
4	vsSE Louisiana	W56-10	—	4	52	13.0	1	27	1.32
5	@Ole Miss	L19-24	24.0	4	23	5.8	0	10	0.54
7	vsSouth Carolina	W20-10	5.9	5	75	15.0	1	43	1.44
8	@Vanderbilt	L24-31	20.3	1	11	11.0	0	11	0.89
9	vsTexas A&M	L25-49	20.7	3	20	6.7	1	12	0.82
12	vsArkansas	W23-22	5.1	2	16	8.0	0	10	—
13	vsWestern Kentucky	W13-10	1.6	2	33	16.5	0	23	—
14	@Oklahoma	L13-17	18.3	2	16	8.0	0	10	—
20	vsHouston	L35-38	7.4	7	68	9.7	1	19	—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

4.5%

Passing plays

7.6%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

3.2%

Passing downs

7.1%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 1.70
Passing downs: 0.40
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.88 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).