#2Kobe Hudson

WR·UCF·2024

Kobe Hudson is a Versatile WR for UCF. Kobe's 2024 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 56 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.47
Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
Total EPA (value)0.45
Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kobe Hudson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Receiving

47 Receptions770 Rec yards4 Rec TD16.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

Efficiency100
Volume20
Explosiveness63
Consistency78
Pass-Down38

Player type

Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.28 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 2.65 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs West Virginia (SP+ 2).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗

Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

Player	Team	Yr	Plays	WEPA/play	Line val	Total EPA
Quadree Henderson	Pittsburgh	2016	63	0.530	1.6	33.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	vsNew Hampshire	W57-3	—	2	61	30.5	0	46	2.45
2	vsSam Houston	W45-14	-6.9	5	104	20.8	0	53	1.35
3	@TCU	W35-34	10.8	6	145	24.2	2	45	1.07
5	vsColorado	L21-48	8.1	2	39	19.5	0	23	0.50
6	@Florida	L13-24	13.8	1	14	14.0	0	14	0.40
7	vsCincinnati	L13-19	-0.1	7	114	16.3	1	29	1.52
8	@Iowa State	L35-38	10.3	3	26	8.7	0	12	0.49
9	vsBYU	L24-37	15.3	1	6	6.0	0	6	0.33
10	vsArizona	W56-12	-2.8	4	58	14.5	0	36	0.80
11	@Arizona State	L31-35	9.4	7	56	8.0	0	23	0.11
13	@West Virginia	L21-31	2.1	2	68	34.0	1	45	2.65
14	vsUtah	L14-28	7.7	7	79	11.3	0	30	1.24

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

7.0%

Passing plays

17.2%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

6.6%

Passing downs

8.0%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.97
Passing downs: 0.90
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.95 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).