#4Khalil Wilkins

QB·West Virginia·2025

Khalil Wilkins is a Dual-Threat QB for West Virginia. Khalil's 2025 season ranks in the 3th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 58 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.46
Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.51
Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Khalil Wilkins's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing

16/36 Comp/Att185 Pass yards1 Pass TD2 INT44.4% Comp %

Rushing

243 Rush yards2 Rush TD58 Carries4.2 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

Efficiency3
Volume65
Dual-Threat65
Consistency0
Clutch100

Player type

Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Peak game: 0.42 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Kansas (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	Rush TD	EPA/play
1	vsRobert Morris	W45-3	—	—	—	—	—	—	31	0	-0.69
4	@Kansas	L10-41	4.1	—	—	—	—	—	36	0	0.42
5	vsUtah	L14-48	22.2	3/6	63	1	0	89.5	39	0	0.20
6	@BYU	L24-38	15.9	7/15	81	0	2	35.8	89	1	0.23
8	@UCF	L13-45	-1.2	5/10	32	0	0	41.8	48	1	0.11
14	vsTexas Tech	L0-49	27.6	1/5	9	0	0	2.5	0	0	-0.39

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

22.6%

Passing plays

24.0%

Rushing plays

21.9%

Standard downs

19.5%

Passing downs

29.4%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.02
Passing downs: 0.63
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.32 / 0.22

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).