Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Khalil Dinkins

#16Khalil Dinkins

Khalil Dinkins is a Versatile TE for Penn State.

2024 Production

Receiving
14 Receptions122 Rec yards2 Rec TD8.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs TE peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency59th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 1.65 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.54 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Kent State (SP+ -33).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ty ThompsonTulane2024480.4200.420.2
Seth GreenMinnesota2018830.3900.032.4
Johnny LanganRutgers2020590.3000.017.7
Evan SvobodaWyoming2024750.2900.021.8
Jordan MyersRice2021590.2700.215.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 2 vs Bowling Green: +1.69 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Kent State: +2.54 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs UCLA: +0.17 EPA/play6Wk 9 vs Wisconsin: +2.17 EPA/play9Wk 12 vs Purdue: +0.28 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Maryland: +0.75 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Oregon: -0.46 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Notre Dame: -0.17 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs SMU: -0.17 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
2vsBowling GreenW34-27-1.8177.0071.69
4vsKent StateW56-0-33.011313.01132.54
6vsUCLAW27-11-1.3166.0060.17
9@WisconsinW28-133.02189.01172.17
12@PurdueW49-10-16.2252.5080.28
14vsMarylandW44-7-3.933612.00230.75
15vsOregonL37-4526.0133.003-0.46
1vsNotre DameL24-2723.922110.5020-0.17
1vsSMUW38-1017.511313.0013-0.17

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
2.5%
Passing plays
5.8%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
2.5%
Passing downs
2.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.47
Passing downs
1.41
Pass / Rush EPA
0.70 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.