Skip to content
Keelan Marion

#0Keelan Marion

WR·Miami·2025

Keelan Marion is a Slot Specialist WR for Miami. Keelan's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 81 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Keelan Marion's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
57 Receptions746 Rec yards2 Rec TD13.1 Yards/rec
Returns
12 Kick returns293 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume22
  • Explosiveness41
  • Consistency56
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency56th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.89 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 3.16 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Syracuse (SP+ -13).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.Central Michigan0.4601.624.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+3.1603.16Wk 1 vs Notre Dame: +0.11 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Bethune-Cookman: -0.34 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs South Florida: +0.95 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Florida: +0.12 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Florida State: -0.22 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Louisville: +0.65 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Stanford: -0.08 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs SMU: +1.83 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Syracuse: +3.16 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs NC State: +1.34 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Virginia Tech: +0.51 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Pittsburgh: +0.05 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsNotre DameW27-2424.43299.70140.11
2vsBethune-CookmanW45-3177.007-0.34
3vsSouth FloridaW49-1211.668113.50360.95
4vsFloridaW26-73.5188.0080.12
6@Florida StateW28-227.2-0.22
8vsLouisvilleL21-2412.45336.60150.65
9vsStanfordW42-7-11.82189.0011-0.08
10@SMUL20-2613.457715.40211.83
11vsSyracuseW38-10-13.1311638.71613.16
12vsNC StateW41-74.879613.70351.34
13@Virginia TechW34-17-10.167913.20320.51
14@PittsburghW38-78.42136.5080.05
20vsOle MissW31-2724.0711416.3152
20vsOhio StateW24-1430.15367.2014
20vsIndianaL21-2732.4166.006
20@Texas A&MW10-320.733311.0020

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
7.8%
Passing plays
15.9%
Rushing plays
0.7%
Standard downs
6.1%
Passing downs
12.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.33
Passing downs
1.06
Pass / Rush EPA
0.68 / -0.18

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.