Skip to content
Katin Houser

#4Katin Houser

Katin Houser is a Dual-Threat QB for Illinois. Katin's 2026 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 60 plays — a elite rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Katin Houser's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
37/52 Comp/Att453 Pass yards6 Pass TD1 INT71.2% Comp %
Rushing
47 Rush yards1 Rush TD7 Carries6.7 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

16
Attempts
7.3y
Avg depth
4.3y
After catch
75%
Catch rate

The ball travels 7.3 yards in the air on an average throw 0.5 yards shorter than the median. Another 4.3 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
0
0
0
short
7
100% · 81y
0
9
56% · 47y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch69
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.95 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs UAB (SP+ -16).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9500.95Wk 1 vs UAB: +0.95 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Duke: +0.42 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsUABW42-23-16.013/171823098.92910.95
2vsDukeL27-316.624/35271311800.42

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
52.6%
Passing plays
100.0%
Rushing plays
12.1%
Standard downs
46.6%
Passing downs
73.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.55
Passing downs
0.70
Pass / Rush EPA
0.60 / 0.55

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.750−0.20
EPA per play · 2025 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.