Skip to content
Kaleb Johnson

#2Kaleb Johnson

RB·Iowa·20244.9 pts line value1st Round

Kaleb Johnson is a Featured Back for Iowa. Kaleb's 2024 season ranks in the 73th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 253 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kaleb Johnson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
1537 Rush yards21 Rush TD240 Carries6.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
22 Receptions188 Rec yards2 Rec TD8.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency73
  • Volume100
  • Explosiveness68
  • Consistency71
  • Receiving43
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)73th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency71th %ile · average
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.23 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.65 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Illinois State.

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5
Ameer AbdullahNebraska0.3805.399.6
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
LeVante BellamyWestern Michigan0.4005.4107.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6500.65Wk 1 vs Illinois State: +0.65 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Iowa State: +0.18 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Troy: +0.28 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Minnesota: +0.54 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Ohio State: -0.04 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Washington: +0.54 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Michigan State: +0.22 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Northwestern: +0.20 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Wisconsin: +0.23 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UCLA: -0.15 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Maryland: +0.25 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Nebraska: -0.01 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsIllinois StateW40-01111910.821800.65
2vsIowa StateL19-2010.3251877.523900.18
3vsTroyW38-21-6.6251736.9211000.28
4@MinnesotaW31-1410.4212069.832-100.54
6@Ohio StateL7-3531.215865.71250-0.04
7vsWashingtonW40-163.1211667.9232210.54
8@Michigan StateL20-32-4.614987.0144900.22
9vsNorthwesternW40-14-8.2141097.832900.20
10vsWisconsinW42-103.0241355.631-200.23
11@UCLAL17-20-1.318492.71-0.15
13@MarylandW29-13-3.9351644.711600.25
14vsNebraskaW13-105.517452.602731-0.01

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
37.2%
Passing plays
8.9%
Rushing plays
53.4%
Standard downs
41.6%
Passing downs
24.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.16
Passing downs
0.46
Pass / Rush EPA
0.48 / 0.19

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.730−0.24
EPA per play · 2024 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.