Skip to content
Kadinn Morris

#84Kadinn Morris

Kadinn Morris is a Versatile TE for Southern Miss.

What projects, and what doesn't · TEs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.42
    Beats guessing the TE average by 9%. n=2,225 TE seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.04
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=2,016 TE seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.46
    Beats guessing the TE average by 13%. n=2,016 TE seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kadinn Morris's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
15 Receptions183 Rec yards2 Rec TD12.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume9
  • Explosiveness35
  • Consistency62
  • Pass-Down76
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency62th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 1.14 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 2.70 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Troy (SP+ -5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ty ThompsonTulane0.4200.720.2
Seth GreenMinnesota0.3900.032.4
Johnny LanganRutgers0.3000.017.7
Evan SvobodaWyoming0.2900.521.8
Jordan MyersRice0.2700.215.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.7002.70Wk 1 vs Mississippi State: +2.37 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Jackson State: +0.64 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs App State: -0.42 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Louisiana Tech: -0.49 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Jacksonville State: +0.75 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Georgia Southern: -0.16 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Louisiana: +2.46 EPA/play8Wk 14 vs Troy: +2.70 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsMississippi StateL17-344.123819.00282.37
2vsJackson StateW38-2022512.51150.64
3vsApp StateW38-22-11.41-2-2.00-2-0.42
4@Louisiana TechL20-30-1.34358.8018-0.49
5vsJacksonville StateW42-25-6.7166.0160.75
7@Georgia SouthernW38-35-9.4144.004-0.16
8@LouisianaW22-10-10.137023.30302.46
14vsTroyL18-28-4.82.70
20vsWestern KentuckyL16-271.6177.007

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
3.0%
Passing plays
5.7%
Rushing plays
0.3%
Standard downs
3.2%
Passing downs
2.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.47
Passing downs
0.63
Pass / Rush EPA
0.41 / 2.70

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.