#12Kaden Anderson

QB·Wyoming·2025

Kaden Anderson is a Clutch Passer for Wyoming. Kaden's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 386 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.46
Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.51
Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kaden Anderson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing

189/336 Comp/Att1971 Pass yards12 Pass TD10 INT56.3% Comp %

Rushing

-33 Rush yards0 Rush TD43 Carries-0.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

Efficiency0
Volume100
Dual-Threat17
Consistency54
Clutch67

Player type

Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency54th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Peak game: 0.37 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Air Force (SP+ -3).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	Rush TD	EPA/play
1	@Akron	W10-0	-13.9	19/36	260	1	1	41.7	20	0	0.24
2	vsNorthern Iowa	W31-7	—	17/23	167	2	0	20.9	-40	0	0.23
3	vsUtah	L6-31	22.2	12/23	108	0	1	22.9	-19	0	-0.07
4	@Colorado	L20-37	-8.3	11/25	176	2	0	51.8	-5	0	0.11
6	vsUNLV	L17-31	4.3	25/46	254	1	1	32.3	9	0	0.08
7	vsSan José State	W35-28	-14.3	23/39	304	2	2	27.4	6	0	0.21
8	@Air Force	L21-24	-3.2	23/29	211	1	1	47.8	5	0	0.37
9	vsColorado State	W28-0	-15.6	16/24	154	2	0	74.6	0	0	0.20
10	@San Diego State	L7-24	6.7	12/24	93	0	3	13.0	-14	0	-0.14
12	@Fresno State	L3-24	1.8	6/23	64	0	1	5.2	0	0	-0.16
13	vsNevada	L7-13	-13.4	22/39	157	1	0	15.7	5	0	-0.03
14	@Hawai'i	L7-27	1.7	3/5	23	0	0	51.6	—	—	0.27

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

48.3%

Passing plays

87.7%

Rushing plays

8.0%

Standard downs

41.7%

Passing downs

60.9%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.05
Passing downs: 0.19
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.13 / -0.01

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).