Skip to content
Julian Lewis

#10Julian Lewis

Julian Lewis is a Clutch Passer for Colorado. Julian's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 98 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Julian Lewis's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
52/94 Comp/Att589 Pass yards4 Pass TD0 INT55.3% Comp %
Rushing
-36 Rush yards0 Rush TD23 Carries-1.6 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

49
Attempts
9.3y
Avg depth
9.5y
After catch
61%
Catch rate

The ball travels 9.3 yards in the air on an average throw 0.8 yards deeper than the median. Another 9.5 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
1
0% · 0y
4
75% · 146y
2
0% · 0y
short
14
71% · 119y
12
67% · 132y
16
56% · 95y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency0
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5200.52Wk 2 vs Delaware: -0.52 EPA/play2Wk 10 vs Arizona: +0.23 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs West Virginia: +0.21 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Arizona State: -0.21 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
2vsDelawareW31-7-10.92/48002.7-80-0.52
10vsArizonaL17-5212.09/171211073.21500.23
11@West VirginiaL22-29-6.822/352992055.8-3900.21
13vsArizona StateL17-423.919/381611022.3-40-0.21

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
39.7%
Passing plays
68.2%
Rushing plays
9.8%
Standard downs
33.0%
Passing downs
49.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.36
Passing downs
0.38
Pass / Rush EPA
0.07 / -0.25

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.