#88Jsi Hatfield

WR·East Carolina·2023

Jsi Hatfield is a Versatile WR for East Carolina. Jsi's 2023 season produced 18.8 total EPA across 34 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.47
Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
Total EPA (value)0.45
Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jsi Hatfield's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Receiving

27 Receptions341 Rec yards1 Rec TD12.6 Yards/rec

Returns

8 Kick returns135 KR yards0 KR TD13 Punt returns96 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

Efficiency100
Volume13
Explosiveness38
Consistency66
Pass-Down1

Player type

Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency66th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.63 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 2.07 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Tulane (SP+ 3).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗

Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

Player	Team	Yr	Plays	WEPA/play	Line val	Total EPA
Quadree Henderson	Pittsburgh	2016	63	0.530	1.6	33.4
DeAndre Hughes	Air Force	2021	60	0.470	1.3	28.2
Savion Williams	TCU	2024	56	0.450	1.1	25.2
Keytaon Thompson	Mississippi State	2017	70	0.460	1.2	32.2
Dane Kinamon	Air Force	2021	39	0.410	0.7	16.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	@Michigan	L3-30	31.3	2	12	6.0	0	7	-0.25
2	vsMarshall	L13-31	-9.0	4	57	14.3	0	39	1.46
3	@App State	L28-43	3.8	—	—	—	—	—	0.28
4	vsGardner-Webb	W44-0	—	3	59	19.7	0	35	1.42
5	@Rice	L17-24	-10.2	5	74	14.8	0	34	0.17
7	vsSMU	L10-31	10.1	1	5	5.0	0	5	-0.28
8	vsCharlotte	L7-10	-21.4	2	12	6.0	0	7	0.39
9	@UTSA	L27-41	5.4	2	17	8.5	0	12	0.89
10	vsTulane	L10-13	2.8	1	32	32.0	0	32	2.07
11	@Florida Atlantic	W22-7	-9.4	3	10	3.3	0	7	-0.53
12	@Navy	L0-10	-13.7	2	18	9.0	0	10	1.88
13	vsTulsa	L27-29	-13.7	2	45	22.5	1	32	1.86

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

4.7%

Passing plays

9.0%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

5.0%

Passing downs

4.2%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.66
Passing downs: 0.36
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.55 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).