Skip to content
Joseph Filardi

#13Joseph Filardi

Joseph Filardi is a Volume Passer for Syracuse. Joseph's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 54 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Joseph Filardi's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
31/65 Comp/Att226 Pass yards1 Pass TD3 INT47.7% Comp %
Rushing
87 Rush yards1 Rush TD30 Carries2.9 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume99
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency0
  • Clutch14
Player type
Volume Passer

High-rep offense that leans on this QB's arm — value comes through cumulative production across a high number of plays.

High play countFranchise-volume role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Peak game: 1.10 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Miami (SP+ 21).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.1001.10Wk 10 vs North Carolina: -0.32 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Miami: +1.10 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Notre Dame: -0.20 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Boston College: +0.05 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
10vsNorth CarolinaL10-27-6.64/1839001.980-0.32
11@MiamiL10-3820.73/3391094.6-801.10
13@Notre DameL7-7024.414/26830311.9331-0.20
14vsBoston CollegeL12-34-8.510/18650012.25400.05

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
34.7%
Passing plays
65.1%
Rushing plays
14.6%
Standard downs
24.9%
Passing downs
53.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.22
Passing downs
-0.35
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.31 / -0.20

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.