Skip to content
Jordan Howard

#8Jordan Howard

RB·UAB·201520143.7 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Jordan Howard is a 2-year Featured Back for UAB. Jordan's 2014 season ranks in the 20th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 258 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jordan Howard's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Rushing
1587 Rush yards13 Rush TD306 Carries5.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
9 Receptions72 Rec yards1 Rec TD8.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency20
  • Volume91
  • Explosiveness44
  • Consistency46
  • Receiving16
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)20th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency46th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.65 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Troy (SP+ -16).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4
Royce FreemanOregon0.3605.199.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6500.65Wk 1 vs Troy: +0.65 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Mississippi State: +0.13 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Alabama A&M: -0.31 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Florida International: -0.16 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Western Kentucky: +0.08 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs North Texas: +0.36 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.04 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Arkansas: +0.33 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.03 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Marshall: +0.11 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Southern Miss: +0.27 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsTroyW48-10-15.9191799.420.65
2@Mississippi StateL34-4722.224893.710.13
3vsAlabama A&MW41-145112.20-0.31
5vsFlorida InternationalL20-34-16.2211024.90150-0.16
6@Western KentuckyW42-39-2.6341835.420.08
7vsNorth TexasW56-21-9.416674.2111210.36
8@Middle TennesseeL22-34-8.7321213.811300.04
9@ArkansasL17-4512.219904.7021500.33
10@Florida AtlanticW31-28-10.4351674.822210
11vsLouisiana TechL24-40-1.7271485.510.03
13vsMarshallL18-2316.8391684.3221600.11
14@Southern MissW45-24-15.9352627.510.27

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
32.0%
Passing plays
2.8%
Rushing plays
50.5%
Standard downs
41.4%
Passing downs
10.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.14
Passing downs
0.30
Pass / Rush EPA
0.43 / 0.15

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.740−0.402015
EPA per play · 2014 — 2015 · 20 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2014UAB
3.7
76.7
2015Indiana
3.5
67.3

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.