Skip to content
Jonah Coleman

#1Jonah Coleman

RB·Washington·20251.6 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Jonah Coleman is a Pass-Catching Back for Washington. Jonah's 2025 season ranks in the 38th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 181 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jonah Coleman's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
758 Rush yards15 Rush TD156 Carries4.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
31 Receptions354 Rec yards2 Rec TD11.4 Yards/rec
Returns
3 Kick returns57 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency38
  • Volume71
  • Explosiveness38
  • Consistency61
  • Receiving72
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)38th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency61th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.34 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.91 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs UC Davis.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9100.91Wk 1 vs Colorado State: +0.51 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UC Davis: +0.91 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Washington State: +0.68 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Ohio State: +0.18 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Maryland: +0.13 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Rutgers: +0.18 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Michigan: +0.32 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Illinois: +0.42 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Wisconsin: -0.37 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs UCLA: +0.35 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Oregon: -0.27 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsColorado StateW38-21-15.6241777.4212200.51
2vsUC DavisW70-10151117.4512400.91
4@Washington StateW59-243.812594.92610410.68
5vsOhio StateL6-2430.113705.4032600.18
6@MarylandW24-200.618573.2184700.13
7vsRutgersW38-191.014443.1112000.18
8@MichiganL7-2412.416503.1134100.32
9vsIllinoisW42-2512.914755.4143210.42
11@WisconsinL10-13-4.4520.402190-0.37
13@UCLAW48-14-8.7461.510.35
14vsOregonL14-2625.99222.40190-0.27
20vsBoise StateW38-103.112857.111100

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
24.8%
Passing plays
9.8%
Rushing plays
39.4%
Standard downs
29.2%
Passing downs
13.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.18
Passing downs
1.07
Pass / Rush EPA
0.81 / 0.19

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.040−0.50
EPA per play · 2025 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.