Skip to content
John Rhys Plumlee
John Rhys Plumlee

#10John Rhys Plumlee

QB·UCF·2023

John Rhys Plumlee is a Dual-Threat QB for UCF. John's 2023 season ranks in the 43th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 321 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So John Rhys Plumlee's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
161/256 Comp/Att2271 Pass yards15 Pass TD8 INT62.9% Comp %
Rushing
505 Rush yards5 Rush TD106 Carries4.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency43
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency82
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)43th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency82th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.16 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.19 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Kent State (SP+ -26).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.1901.19Wk 1 vs Kent State: +1.19 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Boise State: +1.02 EPA/play2Wk 6 vs Kansas: +0.02 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Oklahoma: +0.35 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs West Virginia: +0.67 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Cincinnati: +0.30 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Oklahoma State: +0.77 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Texas Tech: +0.40 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Houston: +0.50 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsKent StateW56-6-26.322/302813287.99011.19
2@Boise StateW18-165.916/242720253.97301.02
6@KansasL22-519.93/7330013.50.02
8@OklahomaL29-3115.016/302482066.6-410.35
9vsWest VirginiaL28-417.525/362743368.84510.67
10@CincinnatiW28-26-6.813/231650074.25310.30
11vsOklahoma StateW45-36.711/182993096.47400.77
12@Texas TechL23-246.116/322481173.88400.40
13vsHoustonW27-13-7.823/272531091.05810.50
20vsGeorgia TechL17-300.316/291982045.5320

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
49.1%
Passing plays
85.9%
Rushing plays
22.9%
Standard downs
42.6%
Passing downs
65.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.37
Passing downs
0.77
Pass / Rush EPA
0.53 / 0.51

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.