Skip to content
John Alan Richter
John Alan Richter

#6John Alan Richter

John Alan Richter is a Clutch Passer for Toledo. John's 2026 season produced 19.9 total EPA across 45 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

27%
projected
band 9%'25 14%45%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So John Alan Richter's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
27/45 Comp/Att448 Pass yards5 Pass TD1 INT60.0% Comp %
Rushing
-18 Rush yards0 Rush TD5 Carries-3.6 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

19
Attempts
10.2y
Avg depth
6.7y
After catch
58%
Catch rate

The ball travels 10.2 yards in the air on an average throw 2.4 yards deeper than the median. Another 6.7 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
1
100% · 60y
1
100% · 29y
1
0% · 0y
short
5
60% · 25y
4
50% · 11y
7
57% · 65y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency83
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)83th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (83th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.54 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Central Connecticut.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5400.54Wk 1 vs Michigan State: +0.40 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Central Connecticut: +0.54 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@Michigan StateL20-301.012/211962165.4-1900.40
2vsCentral ConnecticutW63-1015/2425230100.54

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
42.9%
Passing plays
88.9%
Rushing plays
4.8%
Standard downs
37.7%
Passing downs
52.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.05
Passing downs
1.06
Pass / Rush EPA
0.53 / -0.82

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.