Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Jo'quavious Marks

Jo'quavious Marks

RB·USC·2024
Line value
2.9 pts

Jo'quavious Marks is a Featured Back for USC. Jo'quavious's 2024 season ranks in the 40th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 246 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

2024 Production

Rushing
1133 Rush yards9 Rush TD198 Carries5.7 Yards/carry
Receiving
47 Receptions321 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.8 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)40th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency70th %ile · average
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 0.84 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Utah State (SP+ -10).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State20162880.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State20162920.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State20203010.3404.5102.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan20212800.3804.8106.4
James FlandersTulsa20162660.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs LSU: +0.01 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Utah State: +0.84 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Michigan: +0.36 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Wisconsin: +0.03 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Minnesota: +0.44 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Penn State: +0.10 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Maryland: -0.10 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Rutgers: +0.57 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Washington: +0.38 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Nebraska: +0.32 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UCLA: +0.00 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Notre Dame: +0.27 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsLSUW27-2015.916684.323700.01
2vsUtah StateW48-0-10.4131037.9133900.84
4@MichiganL24-2710.6131007.7054000.36
5vsWisconsinW38-213.019633.3042900.03
6@MinnesotaL17-2410.4201346.7143000.44
7vsPenn StateL30-3324.6201115.6024400.10
8@MarylandL28-29-3.917824.814-30-0.10
9vsRutgersW42-206.415946.3354800.57
10@WashingtonL21-263.1221235.6172600.38
12vsNebraskaW28-205.5191467.7063600.32
13@UCLAW19-13-1.318764.2042500.00
14vsNotre DameL35-4923.96335.500.27

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
29.6%
Passing plays
9.4%
Rushing plays
60.1%
Standard downs
33.2%
Passing downs
20.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.28
Passing downs
0.22
Pass / Rush EPA
0.34 / 0.25

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
2024 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.