#4Jevon Jackson

RB·UAB·2025

Jevon Jackson is a Committee Back for UAB. Jevon's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 173 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.52
Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.41
Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jevon Jackson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing

900 Rush yards5 Rush TD167 Carries5.4 Yards/carry

Receiving

19 Receptions115 Rec yards1 Rec TD6.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

Efficiency0
Volume65
Explosiveness48
Consistency0
Receiving41

Player type

Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.09 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 0.63 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs North Texas (SP+ 14).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

Player	Team	Yr	Plays	WEPA/play	Line val	Total EPA
Saquon Barkley	Penn State	2016	288	0.340	3.9	97.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Car	Rush Yds	Avg	Rush TD	Rec	Rec Yds	Rec TD	EPA/play
1	vsAlabama State	W52-42	—	17	166	9.8	2	—	—	—	0.38
2	@Navy	L24-38	6.2	15	66	4.4	1	2	18	0	0.21
3	vsAkron	W31-28	-13.9	14	45	3.2	0	3	17	1	-0.17
4	@Tennessee	L24-56	15.0	5	3	0.6	0	5	24	0	-0.37
6	vsArmy	L13-31	0.8	12	89	7.4	0	1	11	0	0.18
7	@Florida Atlantic	L33-53	-8.7	8	19	2.4	0	3	37	0	-0.25
8	vsMemphis	W31-24	7.6	17	54	3.2	0	—	—	—	-0.13
10	@UConn	L19-38	5.1	9	61	6.8	0	—	—	—	0.19
11	@Rice	L17-24	-14.8	15	89	5.9	0	—	—	—	-0.11
12	vsNorth Texas	L24-53	13.8	16	159	9.9	0	3	8	0	0.63
13	vsSouth Florida	L18-48	11.6	16	32	2.0	0	2	0	0	-0.41
14	@Tulsa	W31-24	-10.0	23	117	5.1	2	—	—	—	0.36

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

22.9%

Passing plays

5.2%

Rushing plays

46.0%

Standard downs

28.7%

Passing downs

9.8%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.02
Passing downs: 0.56
Pass / Rush EPA: -0.18 / 0.12

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).