Skip to content
Jayden Denegal

#4Jayden Denegal

Jayden Denegal is a Clutch Passer for San Diego State. Jayden's 2026 season produced 3.2 total EPA across 35 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

39%
projected
band 21%'25 40%57%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jayden Denegal's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
18/34 Comp/Att182 Pass yards3 Pass TD2 INT52.9% Comp %
Rushing
15 Rush yards0 Rush TD6 Carries2.5 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

32
Attempts
12.1y
Avg depth
4.7y
After catch
56%
Catch rate

The ball travels 12.1 yards in the air on an average throw 3.6 yards deeper than the median. Another 4.7 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
5
20% · 40y
1
100% · 29y
2
0% · 0y
short
10
60% · 51y
4
50% · 12y
10
80% · 50y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume87
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.45 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Portland State.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4500.45Wk 1 vs Portland State: +0.45 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UCLA: -0.18 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsPortland StateW53-2012/17137212100.45
2@UCLAL10-289.26/174511-60-0.18

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
30.6%
Passing plays
85.4%
Rushing plays
1.3%
Standard downs
23.0%
Passing downs
50.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.14
Passing downs
0.33
Pass / Rush EPA
0.19 / -0.41

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.