Skip to content
Jayden Denegal

#4Jayden Denegal

Jayden Denegal is a Volume Passer for San Diego State. Jayden's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 298 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jayden Denegal's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
143/244 Comp/Att1810 Pass yards9 Pass TD8 INT58.6% Comp %
Rushing
103 Rush yards4 Rush TD67 Carries1.5 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

32
Attempts
12.1y
Avg depth
4.7y
After catch
56%
Catch rate

The ball travels 12.1 yards in the air on an average throw 3.6 yards deeper than the median. Another 4.7 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
5
20% · 40y
1
100% · 29y
2
0% · 0y
short
10
60% · 51y
4
50% · 12y
10
80% · 50y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat43
  • Consistency0
  • Clutch43
Player type
Volume Passer

High-rep offense that leans on this QB's arm — value comes through cumulative production across a high number of plays.

High play countFranchise-volume role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.55 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.45 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Colorado State (SP+ -16).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.4501.45Wk 1 vs Stony Brook: +0.09 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Washington State: +0.01 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs California: +0.26 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Northern Illinois: +0.01 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Colorado State: +1.45 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Nevada: +0.58 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Fresno State: -0.01 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Wyoming: +0.02 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Hawai'i: -0.54 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Boise State: -0.10 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs San José State: -0.13 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs New Mexico: -0.13 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsStony BrookW42-013/252071026.51500.09
2@Washington StateL13-363.815/301331011.3-2810.01
4vsCaliforniaW34-0-3.215/181891074.4900.26
5@Northern IllinoisW6-3-16.713/201100239.81900.01
6vsColorado StateW45-24-15.613/162562099.2201.45
7@NevadaW44-10-13.414/172052092.84100.58
9@Fresno StateW23-01.811/191240133.2300-0.01
10vsWyomingW24-7-11.311/221941238.0200.02
11@Hawai'iL6-381.710/27132026.3-70-0.54
12vsBoise StateW17-73.16/10170023.8162-0.10
13vsSan José StateW25-3-14.38/16810020.3-41-0.13
14@New MexicoL17-230.914/241621138.980-0.13

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
41.0%
Passing plays
96.4%
Rushing plays
10.8%
Standard downs
36.5%
Passing downs
51.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.07
Passing downs
0.08
Pass / Rush EPA
0.08 / 0.11

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.