#86Jax Markovich

TE·Massachusetts·2025

Jax Markovich is a Versatile TE for Massachusetts.

What projects, and what doesn't · TEs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.42
Beats guessing the TE average by 9%. n=2,225 TE seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.04
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=2,016 TE seasons
Total EPA (value)0.46
Beats guessing the TE average by 13%. n=2,016 TE seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jax Markovich's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving

7 Receptions38 Rec yards0 Rec TD5.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

Efficiency0
Volume10
Explosiveness0
Consistency0
Pass-Down100

Player type

Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs TE peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Peak game: 1.03 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Akron (SP+ -14).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

Player	Team	Yr	Plays	WEPA/play	Line val	Total EPA
A.J. Doyle	Massachusetts	2013	53	0.040	0.0	2.1

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Long	EPA/play
9	@Central Michigan	L13-38	-8.8	1	-1	-1.0	0	-0.67
11	@Akron	L10-44	-13.9	1	13	13.0	13	1.03
12	vsNorthern Illinois	L3-45	-16.7	1	4	4.0	4	-1.14
13	@Ohio	L14-42	-4.0	3	20	6.7	16	0.34
14	vsBowling Green	L14-45	-12.6	1	2	2.0	2	-0.32

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

3.5%

Passing plays

5.6%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

3.7%

Passing downs

3.0%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: -0.76
Passing downs: 0.52
Pass / Rush EPA: -0.43 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).