#2Jamarion Morrow

RB·Texas A&M·2025

Jamarion Morrow is a Pass-Catching Back for Texas A&M. Jamarion's 2025 season produced -1.5 total EPA across 47 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.52
Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.41
Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jamarion Morrow's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing

182 Rush yards1 Rush TD43 Carries4.2 Yards/carry

Receiving

6 Receptions80 Rec yards2 Rec TD13.3 Yards/rec

Returns

2 Kick returns34 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

Efficiency0
Volume20
Explosiveness24
Consistency0
Receiving77

Player type

Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.21 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 0.52 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Florida (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Car	Rush Yds	Avg	Rush TD	Rec	Rec Yds	Rec TD	EPA/play
1	vsUTSA	W42-24	3.7	—	—	—	—	1	8	0	0.37
2	vsUtah State	W44-22	-3.1	4	32	8.0	0	—	—	—	0.17
5	vsAuburn	W16-10	11.6	1	1	1.0	0	—	—	—	-0.16
6	vsMississippi State	W31-9	4.1	5	30	6.0	0	—	—	—	0.01
7	vsFlorida	W34-17	3.5	3	8	2.7	0	2	33	1	0.52
8	@Arkansas	W45-42	5.1	3	12	4.0	0	—	—	—	0.22
9	@LSU	W49-25	10.3	3	26	8.7	1	1	24	1	0.50
11	@Missouri	W38-17	14.4	9	15	1.7	0	—	—	—	-0.82
12	vsSouth Carolina	W31-30	5.9	4	3	0.8	0	1	9	0	0.24
13	vsSamford	W48-0	—	9	52	5.8	0	1	6	0	0.17
14	@Texas	L17-27	16.2	2	3	1.5	0	—	—	—	-0.23

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

7.1%

Passing plays

3.0%

Rushing plays

10.5%

Standard downs

7.5%

Passing downs

6.2%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.04
Passing downs: -0.25
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.35 / -0.14

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).