#9Jamari Johnson

TE·Oregon·2025

Jamari Johnson is a Slot Specialist TE for Oregon. Jamari's 2025 season produced 41.7 total EPA across 34 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · TEs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.42
Beats guessing the TE average by 9%. n=2,225 TE seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.04
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=2,016 TE seasons
Total EPA (value)0.46
Beats guessing the TE average by 13%. n=2,016 TE seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jamari Johnson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving

32 Receptions510 Rec yards3 Rec TD15.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

Efficiency100
Volume13
Explosiveness60
Consistency72
Pass-Down100

Player type

Slot Specialist TE

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency72th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.15 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 3.23 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Wisconsin (SP+ -4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
2	vsOklahoma State	W69-3	-15.1	1	6	6.0	0	6	0.40
3	@Northwestern	W34-14	5.8	2	22	11.0	0	17	-0.13
4	vsOregon State	W41-7	-15.9	2	21	10.5	0	13	1.80
5	@Penn State	W30-24	18.1	1	2	2.0	1	2	—
7	vsIndiana	L20-30	32.4	1	3	3.0	0	3	-0.44
8	@Rutgers	W56-10	1.0	1	56	56.0	0	56	2.06
9	vsWisconsin	W21-7	-4.4	1	23	23.0	0	23	3.23
11	@Iowa	W18-16	19.7	4	36	9.0	0	21	0.51
12	vsMinnesota	W42-13	1.5	4	57	14.3	0	24	0.79
13	vsUSC	W42-27	16.9	3	34	11.3	0	15	1.28
14	@Washington	W26-14	18.4	3	60	20.0	0	31	2.64
20	vsIndiana	L22-56	32.4	4	83	20.8	1	39	—
20	vsTexas Tech	W23-0	27.6	4	66	16.5	0	26	—
20	vsJames Madison	W51-34	12.3	1	41	41.0	1	41	—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

4.6%

Passing plays

10.2%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

3.1%

Passing downs

8.5%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.65
Passing downs: 1.88
Pass / Rush EPA: 1.23 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).