Skip to content
Jake Wilson

#89Jake Wilson

Jake Wilson is a Versatile TE for Wyoming.

What projects, and what doesn't · TEs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.42
    Beats guessing the TE average by 9%. n=2,225 TE seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.04
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=2,016 TE seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.46
    Beats guessing the TE average by 13%. n=2,016 TE seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jake Wilson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Receiving
5 Receptions86 Rec yards0 Rec TD17.2 Yards/rec

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

6
Targets
10.5y
Avg depth
8.6y
After catch
83%
Catch rate

The ball travels 10.5 yards in the air on an average target 1.6 yards deeper than the median. Another 8.6 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
0
1
100% · 29y
1
0% · 0y
short
2
100% · 31y
1
100% · 22y
1
100% · 4y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs TE peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume15
  • Explosiveness68
  • Consistency50
  • Pass-Down50
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • Peak game: 2.04 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Colorado State (SP+ -8).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.0402.04Wk 1 vs Colorado State: +2.04 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Northern Colorado: +0.65 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@Colorado StateL13-35-7.525125.50292.04
2vsNorthern ColoradoW21-1333511.70280.65

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.1%
Passing plays
13.3%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
7.2%
Passing downs
0.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
1.12
Passing downs
Pass / Rush EPA
1.12 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.