Skip to content
Jake Fromm

#11Jake Fromm

QB·Georgia·20192018201711.7 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Jake Fromm is a 3-year Clutch Passer for Georgia. Jake's 2018 season ranks in the 93th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 341 plays — a elite rate for the QB. Production has trended downward season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jake Fromm's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2017

4-Star · High major target
Stars
247 composite
0.9794
National rank
#44
High school
Houston County
Hometown
Warner Robins, GA

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2018 Production

Passing
206/305 Comp/Att2749 Pass yards30 Pass TD6 INT67.5% Comp %
Rushing
-27 Rush yards0 Rush TD41 Carries-0.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2018 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency93
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat7
  • Consistency87
  • Clutch83
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)93th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency87th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:↓ Declining
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Production has slipped season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 10 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.93 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Vanderbilt (SP+ 8).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6
Blake SimsAlabama0.69615.4329.4
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9300.93Wk 1 vs Austin Peay: +0.87 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs South Carolina: +0.56 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.77 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Missouri: +0.67 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Tennessee: +0.31 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Vanderbilt: +0.93 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs LSU: +0.07 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Florida: +0.69 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Kentucky: +0.31 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Auburn: +0.56 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Massachusetts: +0.59 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Georgia Tech: +0.91 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Alabama: +0.53 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Texas: +0.36 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsAustin PeayW45-012/16157200.87
2@South CarolinaW41-1714.915/1819411-500.56
3vsMiddle TennesseeW49-7-3.810/1212830-1100.77
4@MissouriW43-2920.813/2326031800.67
5vsTennesseeW38-125.516/2218500-1400.31
6vsVanderbiltW41-137.617/2327630200.93
7@LSUL16-3624.216/3420912-1900.07
9vsFloridaW36-1723.017/24240301100.69
10@KentuckyW34-1713.114/201131076.7200.31
11vsAuburnW27-1023.613/2019321500.56
12vsMassachusettsW66-27-16.15/5106100.59
13vsGeorgia TechW45-210.313/1617540100.91
14vsAlabamaL28-3536.325/3830130-200.53
1vsTexasL21-2811.320/3421231-500.36

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
36.5%
Passing plays
85.3%
Rushing plays
5.3%
Standard downs
31.5%
Passing downs
49.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.44
Passing downs
0.65
Pass / Rush EPA
0.57 / -0.06

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.650−0.3720182019
EPA per play · 2017 — 2019 · 43 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2017Georgia
8.8
210.4
2018Georgia
11.7
250.2
2019Georgia
7.2
212.2

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.